NatJEUSAL

NatJEUSAL action

 

Funded by the European Commission – Dg Comp

co-funded by the University of Padova Department for Public Law, International and EU Law -DiPIC

Grant Agreement HT.5430.SI2.791660

Training of National Judges - Call for Proposals HT.5155

 

Main Partners

 

University of Padova

University of Murcia

University of Würzburg

National University of Ireland, Maynooth

Riga Graduate School of Law

University of Zagreb

 

**

 

First Residential Training Seminar

Murcia, 30, 31 May 2019

Working Languages: Spanish, English

 

Session I

DATE

TOPIC

TIME

SPEAKER 

30 May

Introduction

16:00 – 16:10

Juan Jorge Piernas López and Bernardo Cortese

Universidad de Murcia/University of Padova

30 May

Article 107(1) TFEU           The notion of State aid

16.10 – 16.50

Aindrais O´Cahoim

Former Judge of the Court of Justice of the European Union

30 May

Article 107(2) and (3)       authorized aid

16.50 – 17:30

Delia Ferri

Maynooth University

BREAK 17:30 – 18:00

30 May

The State Aid Tax Cases: A Practical and a Philosophical Perspective

18.00- 18.40

Vincent Power

A&L Goodbody

 

30 May

Discussion /sharing experiences

 18:40 – 19:20

Marie Baker

High Court of Ireland

 

Session II

DATE

TOPIC

TIME

 SPEAKER

31 May

 Role of national judges in the enforcement of Article 108(3) TFEU (standstill obligation) - Rol del juez nacional en la aplicación del articulo 108.3

9:30 – 10:10

David Ordoñez Solís

Magistrado, miembro Red de especialistas en Derecho de la Unión Europea del CGPJ

31 May

Role of national judges in the implementation of recovery decisions - La competencia del juez nacional en la recuperación

10.10 – 10.50

Mercedes Pedraz Calvo

Magistrada Audiencia Nacional

BREAK 10.50-11.20

31 May

Recovery of fiscal State aid - La recuperación de las ayudas de Estado ilegales

11.20 – 12:00

Joaquín Huelin Martínez de Velasco

Cuatrecasas

31 May

References by national courts for preliminary rulings

 12:00 – 12:40

Daniel Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero

Uría – Universidad Complutense de Madrid

 

Session III

DATE

TOPIC

TIME

 SPEAKER 

31 May

Instruments of cooperation with the European Commission

 

16:00 – 16:40

          William M. McKechnie

     Supreme Court of Ireland

31 May

Exemptions in the field of SGEI

16.40 – 17.20

Juan Jorge Piernas López

Universidad de Murcia

BREAK 17.20-17.50

31 May

Conclusion

18.30-19.00

Juan Jorge Piernas López, Delia Ferri and Bernardo Cortese

Universidad de Murcia/Maynooth University/University of Padova

 

**

 

Second Residential Training Seminar

Würzburg, 14, 15 November 2020

Alte Universität, Domerschulstr. 16, Würzburg,

Working Language: German

DATE

TOPIC

TIME

SPEAKER

14 November

(Introduction, Exchange of Experiences)

 

Einführung, Vorstellungsrunde, Erfahrungsaustausch

 

18.15 - 19

Prof. Dr. Bernardo Cortese, Università degli Studi di Padova Prof. Dr. Florian Bien, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

15 November

(State Measures as State Aid under Art 107.1 TFEU)

Staatliche Vergünstigungen als Beihilfen im Sinne von Art. 107 Abs. 1 AEUV

 

9.00 – 9.45

Prof. Dr. Markus Ludwigs, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

15 November

(Exceptions and Derogations according to Arts. 106.2, 107.2 TFEU; the GBER)

Ausnahmen vom Beihilfeverbot (Art. 106 Abs. 2, Art. 107 Abs. 2 und 3 AEUV) und Allgemeine Gruppenfreistellungsverordnung vom 17.6.2014

 

9.45 – 10:30

Prof. Dr. Sebastian Unger,
Ruhr-Universität Bochum

BREAK 10:30 – 11:00

 

15 November

 (Assessing State Aid before State Civil and Administrative Courts)

Das Beihilfeprüfverfahren vor den staatlichen Zivil- und Verwaltungsgerichten im Überblick

11.00- 11.45

RA Dr. Andrés Martin-Ehlers, LL.M. (King’s College London), Oppenhoff & Partner, Frankfurt

 

15 November

(The Cooperation between National Courts and the European Commission)

Die Zusammenarbeit zwischen nationalen Gerichten und Europäischer Kommission in Beihilfesachen gemäß Artikel 29 VO (EU) 2015/1589

 11:45 – 12:30

Dr. Kathrin Blanck, LL.M., Juristischer Dienst, Europäische Kommission, Brüssel

BREAK 12:30 – 14:00

15 November

(Art. 108.3 Prohibition as an Unfair Competition Law Rule)

Das Durchführungsverbot des Art. 108 Abs. 3 S. 3 AEUV als Schutzgesetz zugunsten der Mitbewerber i.S.d. § 823 Abs. 2 BGB und als Marktverhaltensregelung i.S.d. § 3a UWG

 

14.00 – 14.45

Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Joachim Bornkamm, Vors.RiBGH a. D., Freiburg

15 November

(The Status and Effects of Commission’s Decisions in State Aid Assessment before National Courts)

Die Bedeutung von Kommissionsentscheidungen im Beihilfeprüfverfahren für die nationalen Gerichte

14.45 – 15.30

Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Klaus Rennert, Präsident des Bundesverwaltungsgerichts, Leipzig

BREAK 15:30 – 16:00

15 November

(Invoking the Nullity of the Contract in Breach of Art. 108.3 TFEU)

Die Geltendmachung der Vertragsnichtigkeit gemäß §§ 134 BGB i.V.m. Art. 108 Abs. 3 AEUV

16.00 – 16.45

RAin Kathrin Dingemann, Redeker Sellner Dahs, Berlin

15 November

(Discussion and Conclusions)

Schlusswort und Abschlussdiskussion

 

16.45

Prof. Dr. Bernardo Cortese, Università degli Studi di Padova Prof. Dr. Florian Bien, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

 

 

**

 

Third Hybrid Training Seminar

Padova, 22 December 2022

 

Incontro di studio
L’applicazione decentrata del diritto UE degli aiuti di Stato

 

22 dicembre 2021, ore 15-17 - Università di Padova, Sala Baldo e piattaforma Zoom

 

Relazioni:

 

La Comunicazione della Commissione relativa all’applicazione della normativa in materia di aiuti di Stato da parte dei giudici nazionali

Dott. Leonardo Armati, Commissione europea, DG COMP

 

Il contributo del giudice nazionale

Dott. Massimo Scuffi, Presidente, Commissione Tributaria Regionale per il Veneto,

 

La valutazione degli elementi della nozione di aiuto da parte dei giudici nazionali, con particolare riferimento all’effetto sugli scambi fra Stati membri

Prof. Bernardo Cortese, Ordinario di Diritto dell’Unione europea

 

A seguire

Dibattito con i partecipanti

 

  • il requisito degli effetti sugli scambi tra Stati membri, in relazione alla nozione di aiuto di Stato, ai sensi dell’art. 107 TFUE, collocato nella diversa funzione di controllo svolta dal giudice interno sulle misure nazionali, rispetto a quella del giudice UE sulle decisioni della Commissione
  • la gestione, a livello nazionale, degli ordini di recupero relativi a regimi di aiuti e la relativa tutela giurisdizionale (anche in correlazione con il profilo summenzionato)
  • il profilo dell’affidamento legittimo, oltre la giurisprudenza relativa alla validità dell’ordine di recupero, ed in particolare nell’ottica di un’eventuale responsabilità degli organi interni                                         

 

**

(Session I) First Seminar – Brochure

**

(Session II) Second Seminar – Brochure

**

(Session III) Third Seminar – Brochure

 

**

Reports:

Second Seminar ; Third Seminar

 

    

- Enrollment